Research Integrity QC AI

AI-assisted pre-submission quality control for manuscripts, figures, statistics, and source data.

A confidential workflow that helps research teams flag potential issues for human review before journal submission.

Early pilots use synthetic, public, already-submitted, de-identified, or otherwise non-sensitive materials only.

QC findings dashboard
Findings 12
High 1
Moderate 4
F-001

Figure similarity candidate

Figure 3 panels B and D require author review.

High
S-001

Statistical reporting mismatch

Methods describe SD; figure legend describes SEM.

Moderate
D-001

Source-data alignment

Manuscript states n=8; source CSV shows n=7.

Moderate
Sample QC report cover page

Downloadable QC report

Evidence-linked findings, calm severity labels, and recommended author actions.

A confidential QC workflow before submission

The first product should be narrow, useful, and trusted: upload non-sensitive files, run structured checks, review evidence, then generate a practical report.

1

Prepare package

Manuscript, figures, tables, and optional structured data.

2

Run QC checks

Manuscript consistency, figure review, statistics, and data alignment.

3

Review findings

Evidence locations, confidence levels, and calm recommendations.

4

Correct before submission

Use the report as a pre-submission checklist for the research team.

Synthetic biomarker bar chart used in the demo package Synthetic figure panel similarity candidate

Built around concrete report value

The sample package includes seeded issues so potential design partners can evaluate the report format without sharing unpublished or sensitive data.

  • Manuscript claim drift and missing verification statements.
  • Figure panel similarity candidates for human review.
  • SD/SEM and sample-size consistency checks.
  • Downloadable report template for concierge alpha pilots.

Request pilot access

Use this early form to start a discovery conversation. Do not send confidential manuscripts, identifiable patient data, or unpublished source datasets through this page.

Positioned as quality improvement, not accusation

This workflow flags potential issues for human review. It does not determine misconduct, fabrication, falsification, image manipulation, plagiarism, or fraud.

Contact Xi-Long Zheng